EBITDAR: Complete Guide to Calculation & Analysis for UK Businesses
What is EBITDAR? Definition and Meaning
EBITDAR stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortisation and Restructuring or Rent costs. This non-GAAP financial metric strips away financing decisions, tax structures, non-cash expenses and occupancy costs to reveal a company’s core operational performance.
Think of EBITDAR as looking at a business through thermal imaging — you see the heat of actual operations without the insulation of accounting treatments. While traditional metrics include rent as an operating expense, EBITDAR removes this fixed cost to enable clearer comparisons between companies with different property ownership models.
The metric gained prominence during the 2008 financial crisis when restructuring costs became commonplace, with UK companies increasingly reporting EBITDAR alongside statutory figures. However, critics argue this metric can mask underlying financial weaknesses by excluding legitimate operating costs.
EBITDAR Formula and Calculation Methods
The EBITDAR calculation follows two primary approaches:
Method 1: Bottom-Up Approach
EBITDAR = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortisation + Restructuring/Rent Costs
Method 2: Top-Down Approach
EBITDAR = Revenue - Operating Expenses (excluding rent, depreciation, amortisation, and restructuring)
Most UK analysts prefer the bottom-up method for its audit trail clarity. Each component serves a specific purpose:
The rent component requires careful definition. Under IFRS 16, operating leases appear on balance sheets as right-of-use assets, complicating EBITDAR calculations. Companies must clearly state whether they’re adding back lease liabilities, operating lease expenses, or both.
Restructuring costs present another complexity. One-off redundancy payments differ from ongoing operational reorganisation. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales recommends transparency and clarity in financial reporting, such as separately disclosing recurring versus non-recurring restructuring adjustments.
Step-by-Step EBITDAR Calculation Example
Consider a hypothetical UK hotel chain’s quarterly results:
Starting Point: Income Statement (£ m)
EBITDAR Calculation (Bottom-Up):
Net Income: £4.9m
Add back Tax: £1.2m
Add back Interest: £1.2m
Add back Depreciation: £2.8m
Add back Amortisation: £0.4m
Add back Rent: £6.5m
EBITDAR = £17.0m
The £17.0m EBITDAR represents 37.8% of revenue. However, this metric alone doesn't reveal whether the business generates sufficient cash to meet obligations.
EBITDAR vs EBITDA: Key Differences Explained
EBITDAR extends EBITDA by adding back rent or restructuring costs, creating distinct use cases:
The rent add-back makes EBITDAR particularly valuable when comparing companies with different real estate strategies. A retailer owning its stores shows higher EBITDA than one leasing identical properties, despite similar operations. EBITDAR neutralises this difference.
Consider two hypothetical competing restaurant chains:
Chain A owns 80% of locations: EBITDA margin 18%, EBITDAR margin 22%
Chain B leases 95% of locations: EBITDA margin 8%, EBITDAR margin 21%
Without EBITDAR, Chain A appears superior. The metric reveals comparable operational efficiency once occupancy costs are normalised. Yet this comparison assumes rent represents a discretionary cost, which it isn’t — bills must be paid regardless of the accounting treatment.
When to Use EBITDAR: Industries and Applications
EBITDAR proves most valuable in sectors with high, variable occupancy costs or frequent restructuring. The metric serves different purposes across industries:
Primary Applications:
Hotels and hospitality face lease-versus-management contract decisions. EBITDAR enables comparison between franchised locations (low rent, high fees) and leased properties (high rent, full control).
Airlines use EBITDAR to compare carriers with owned versus leased fleets. February 2024 data from the CAPA – Centre for Aviation reports that low-cost airlines lease 68% of their fleets, compared to a global airline average of 53%. EBITDAR strips out these structural differences.
Healthcare organisations, particularly care homes and private hospitals, employ EBITDAR when evaluating operational efficiency across owned and leased facilities.
Secondary Uses:
Retail chains undergoing store rationalisation programmes use EBITDAR to assess core trading performance while restructuring costs flow through. Private equity buyers focus on EBITDAR when evaluating leveraged buyouts, as post-acquisition capital structures will change.
However, technology companies rarely use EBITDAR. Their limited physical footprints and minimal restructuring make the metric less relevant than metrics like recurring revenue or customer acquisition costs.
Benefits and Limitations of EBITDAR Analysis
EBITDAR offers clear advantages but carries significant risks that analysts must acknowledge:
Benefits:
Enables comparison across different ownership models
Removes non-cash charges that don’t affect liquidity
Highlights operational performance independent of financial structure
Useful for businesses in transition or restructuring
Provides cleaner multiple for valuations in lease-heavy sectors
Limitations and Risks:
Ignores genuine cash obligations (rent must be paid)
Can mask deteriorating financial health
Not recognised under IFRS
Excludes capital intensity differences
May encourage aggressive lease accounting
Removes costs that affect long-term sustainability
It is important to recognize that EBITDAR can mask underlying cash flow obligations by excluding rent expenses, and thus should not be used as a sole measure of profitability for a company — especially in sectors like retail with heavy fixed rental costs.
EBITDAR for Hotels, Airlines and High-Rent Businesses
These sectors developed EBITDAR as their primary performance metric due to structural characteristics:
Hotels:Hotels typically allocate a significant portion of revenue to property costs. Management contracts, franchise and owned properties create vastly different P&L structures. EBITDAR allows operators like Whitbread and InterContinental Hotels Group to benchmark properties regardless of ownership model. The metric becomes crucial during management contract negotiations.
Airlines: Aircraft leasing represents a large portion of airline operating costs, especially for low-cost airlines. EBITDAR helps investors compare carriers during fleet transitions.
Retail and Restaurants: High street retailers face billions of pounds in annual rental costs. EBITDAR reveals whether poor performance stems from operational issues or excessive rents. Restaurant chains use EBITDAR-to-sales ratios to determine optimal locations.
Care Homes and Private Hospitals: These facilities employ EBITDAR given their mix of owned, leased and managed facilities.
How to Interpret EBITDAR Results
EBITDAR interpretation requires context beyond the absolute figure. Consider multiple perspectives:
Trend Analysis: Quarter-on-quarter EBITDAR growth indicates operational momentum. However, if EBITDAR rises while EBITDA falls, the business may be trading space for operational efficiency — a warning sign.
Margin Evolution:
Coverage Ratios: EBITDAR must cover various obligations. Minimum healthy ratios include:
EBITDAR/Total Rent: >1.8x (sufficient to cover occupancy)
EBITDAR/Interest: >4.0x (debt service capability)
EBITDAR/Maintenance CapEx: >2.5x (asset sustainability)
Peer Comparison: Compare EBITDAR margins within specific sub-sectors. A budget hotel with a 30% EBITDAR margin sits above the peer median, while a luxury property at the same level would be below sector norms.
Red flags emerge when companies emphasise EBITDAR while downplaying traditional metrics. If management discussions shift from EBITDA to EBITDAR without clear explanation, scrutinise whether they’re masking deterioration through metric shopping.
EBITDAR Coverage Ratios and Benchmarks
Financial covenants increasingly reference EBITDAR in lease-heavy sectors.
The ratio calculation varies by stakeholder perspective:
Landlords focus on EBITDAR/Rent to assess tenant viability
Lenders examine EBITDAR/Total Fixed Charges including rent and interest
Equity investors analyse EBITDAR/Enterprise Value for valuation
During stress testing, reduce EBITDAR by 20–30% to assess downside coverage.
Benchmark against industry quartiles rather than averages, as outliers skew sector means. Focus on comparable business models — a London hotel’s EBITDAR differs structurally from a motorway service station despite both being “hospitality.”
EBITDAR adds back rent or restructuring costs that EBITDA includes as operating expenses. This typically increases the figure by 15–40% for lease-heavy businesses. While EBITDA suits asset-owning companies, EBITDAR better compares businesses with different property strategies. The additional adjustment neutralises the impact of real estate ownership models on operational performance metrics.
Hotels and airlines operate with various asset ownership models — from full ownership to management contracts and leases. These structural differences create incomparable EBITDA figures despite similar operations. EBITDAR removes occupancy cost variations, enabling meaningful performance comparisons across properties or fleets. The metric helps investors assess management effectiveness independent of capital allocation decisions.
Start with net income from the income statement. Add back interest expense, tax expense, depreciation and amortisation — all clearly labelled line items. Then add rental or restructuring costs, which may appear within operating expenses. For UK companies reporting under IFRS 16, include lease liability interest and right-of-use asset depreciation. Always verify which rental costs are included, as definitions vary between companies.
Not necessarily. While higher EBITDAR suggests stronger operational performance, it ignores whether the business generates sufficient cash to meet obligations. A company with high EBITDAR but excessive rental commitments may struggle despite apparently strong metrics. Evaluate EBITDAR alongside coverage ratios, cash conversion rates and traditional profitability measures for complete analysis.
Disclaimer: CMC Markets is an execution-only service provider. The material (whether or not it states any opinions) is for general information purposes only, and does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment or other advice on which reliance should be placed. No opinion given in the material constitutes a recommendation by CMC Markets or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although we are not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, we do not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination.

