69 procent av alla icke-professionella kunder förlorar pengar på CFD-handel hos den här leverantören. Du bör tänka efter om du har råd med den stora risk som finns för att du kommer att förlora dina pengar.


Could stock market action over the next few months predict who’ll win the race to the White House?

Could stock market action over the next few months predict who’ll win the race to the White House?

A special report by Colin Cieszynski, CFA, CMT, CFTe, Chief Market Strategist, CMC Markets 1st February 2016: As the US gears up to the primary season this month, Colin Cieszynski looks at stock market action over the next few months and whether this will predict who will move into the White House later this year. Within this special report Colin Cieszynski focuses on: • How stock markets have performed on a monthly basis over the last 14 presidential election years • How this historical performance could forecast the 2016 election result • The impact of January market action and any potential signs ahead of the upcoming election After jockeying for position through the second half of 2015, the rubber hits the road this month for US Presidential Candidates, as US Primary season starts to sort out the contenders from the pretenders. Public opinion toward the parties and their candidates can be measured in many ways. While the actual; primary results can get a candidate elected, how the stock market reacts to these results can provide a broader gauge of opinion that reaches beyond party members. The table below shows how stock markets have performed on a monthly basis over the last 14 presidential election years (since 1960). This tells us a few things both about how the election campaign may influence the stock market and also how the stock market could predict how the campaign could go. The table compares what happened in years where the party changed power, versus years where whichever party held the White house was re-elected. It also compares how markets performed in years when there was an incumbent running again versus years where there was a wide open race. no incmbno incumb change no chng incumbt no incmbchange no change 7 7 7 7 5 2 Jan (0.40%) 1.65% 1.95% (0.70%) (1.79%) 2.03% Feb (1.90%) 1.47% 0.07% (0.51%) (2.25%) 3.84% March 0.04% 0.22% (0.60%) 0.85% 1.67% (1.19%) April 2.37% 0.32% 1.19% 1.50% 1.73% 0.92% May 0.32% (1.30%) (0.73%) (0.25%) (0.59%) 0.59% June (0.89%) 1.80% 0.79% 0.11% (1.19%) 3.38% July 0.57% (0.79%) 0.57% (0.79%) (1.23%) 0.30% August 0.79% 1.66% 1.75% 0.71% 1.97% (2.46%) Sept (1.67%) 1.77% 0.63% (0.53%) (2.43%) 4.20% Oct (2.01%) 0.17% (0.36%) (1.48%) (2.37%) 0.74% Nov 0.59% 2.18% 3.79% (1.02%) (1.15%) (0.68%) Dec 0.66% 1.07% 0.27% 1.45% 1.55% 1.22% Source: CMC Markets (Note: to qualify as an incumbent the same person had to be running again so Johnson in 1964 and Ford in 1976 are considered non-incumbents in this study because they were appointed mid-term.) There are a number of interesting observations we can draw from this chart. Firstly, in years when the party in power changed hands in November, January and February saw negative returns on average. On the other hand, in years where January and February were positive, the party in power was re-elected. This suggests that stock market action early in the year may be an early indicator of the level of content or discontent with the economic and political direction of the country. Secondly, looking specifically at years where there was no incumbent running for President as will be the case in 2016, the stock market (Dow Jones Industrial Average) has gone down in January and February on average but has gone up in years when there was an incumbent running. This suggests some initial uncertainty about who could win and what policy changes they could make can drag on stock markets through the early stages of the campaign. Finally, taking a deeper look at non-incumbent elections, years where the party in power held on to the White House with a different candidate, January and February posted strong 2-4% gains while years that ended with a governing party’s new candidate fail to hold on to the White House, stocks fell about 2% in January and February. What does all of this mean for 2016? US stocks have had a pretty good run under President Obama over the last seven years helped by a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board. The Fed is expected to be on a course of normalizing interest rates through 2016, a sign that the economy is finally back up on its feet and growing. Based on this, it would seem heading into 2016 that the level of discontent in the economy and desire for political change would be relatively low, so if all goes to plan, stocks should perform relatively well in January and February on expectations of a positive environment for corporate earnings. Rising stocks could also indicate that Hillary Clinton (who at the time of writing has a commanding lead in the Democratic nomination race) could go all the way this time and bring her family back to the White House and continue the same general economic policy direction of President Obama. What does January market action tell us about the election? Last month was the sixth negative January in a Presidential year since 1960 and the third in the 21st Century. Of the five previous times January was down, four were in years with no incumbent running, a sign that an open election creates some uncertainty. Of the four down Januarys with no incumbent, all of them saw the party in power change in November. This could be an ominous sign for the Democrats because it suggests a more uncertain outlook for the year which could eventually lead to a desire for political change come the autumn. This could improve the election prospects for one of the several Republican candidates in their runs for the Oval Office. That being said, one of the rare times a positive January saw an incumbent defeated was in 1992 when Bill Clinton took on the elder George Bush (The other was 1980 when Ronald Reagan ousted Jimmy Carter), so we’ll see if the Clintons have any rabbits left in their collective hats or not. Just for interest 1996, the last time a Clinton was their party’s Presidential nominee, the market had a positive year and since they are known quantities (for better or for worse) a market rebound in the coming months could favour the Clintons over their opponents. 1960 1968 1984 2000 2008 2016 incumbent no no yes no no no party change yes yes no yes yes January (8.39%) (5.52%) (3.02%) (4.84%) (4.63%) (5.50%) February 1.29% (1.75%) (5.41%) (7.42%) (3.04%) March (2.22%) 0.00% 0.87% 7.83% (0.03%) April (2.44%) 8.57% 0.52% (1.72%) 4.55% May 3.99% (1.43%) (5.64%) (1.97%) (1.42%) June 2.40% (0.22%) 2.54% (0.71%) (10.19%) July (3.75%) (1.56%) (1.50%) 0.72% 0.25% August 1.46% 1.47% 9.78% 6.59% 1.45% September (7.20%) 4.35% (1.47%) (5.04%) (6.00%) October 0.00% 1.82% 0.08% 3.01% (14.06%) November 2.93% 3.47% (1.57%) (5.08%) (5.32%) December 3.02% (4.26%) 1.94% 3.57% (0.60%) 1980 1992 1996 incumbent yes yes yes party change yes yes no January 4.42% 1.74% 5.43% February (3.43%) 1.37% 1.67% March (7.10%) (0 98%) 1.86% April 4.08% 3.83% (0.32%) May 4.04% 1.10% 1.33% June 2.00% (2.30%) 0.19% July 7.84% 2.26% (2.23%) August (0.32%) (4.01%) 1.59% September 0.00% 0.43% 4.74% October (0.86%) (1.38%) 2.50% November 7.47% 2.45% 8.16% December (3.02%) (0.12%) (1.12%) -Ends- About CMC Markets CMC Markets is Canada's leading online CFD provider and was the first company in the world to offer online FX trading. With offices in Toronto, CMC Markets has been offering CFDs and FX to Canadian traders since 2005. Since Peter Cruddas founded CMC Markets in 1989, the company now services more than 80,000 clients worldwide, who placed approximately 30 million trades last year. For more information on CMC Markets visit This commentary is based upon technical analysis. Technical analysis does not consider any of the fundamentals of an underlying company, and as such is inherently uncertain and should not be the only factor considered by an investor in making an investment decision. CMC Markets Canada Inc. is a member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Member-Canadian Investor Protection Fund / Membre-Fonds canadien de protection des épargnants. CFDs are distributed in Canada by CMC Markets Canada Inc. dealer and agent of CMC Markets UK plc. Trading CFDs and FX involves a high degree of risk and investors should be prepared for the risk of losing their entire investment and losing further amounts. CMC Markets is an execution only dealer and does not provide investment advice or recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of any securities. CFD and FX trading is available in jurisdictions in which CMC is registered or exempt from registration, and in Alberta is available to Accredited Investors only. Note that any references to CFD prices or price changes are sourced from CMC Markets' proprietary trading system Marketmaker™. Copyright 2016, CMC Markets. All rights reserved. CMC Markets is an execution only service provider. The material (whether or not it states any opinions) is for general information purposes only, and does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment or other advice on which reliance should be placed. No opinion given in the material constitutes a recommendation by CMC Markets or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.

CMC Markets erbjuder sin tjänst som ”execution only”. Detta material (antingen uttryckt eller inte) är endast för allmän information och tar inte hänsyn till dina personliga omständigheter eller mål. Ingenting i detta material är (eller bör anses vara) finansiella, investeringar eller andra råd som beroende bör läggas på. Inget yttrande i materialet utgör en rekommendation från CMC Markets eller författaren om en viss investering, säkerhet, transaktion eller investeringsstrategi. Detta innehåll har inte skapats i enlighet med de regler som finns för oberoende investeringsrådgivning. Även om vi inte uttryckligen hindras från att handla innan vi har tillhandhållit detta innehåll försöker vi inte dra nytta av det innan det sprids.

Standardiserad riskvarning: CFD-kontrakt är komplexa instrument som innebär stor risk för snabba förluster på grund av hävstången. 69 procent av alla icke-professionella kunder förlorar pengar på CFD-handel hos den här leverantören. Du bör tänka efter om du förstår hur CFD-kontrakt fungerar och om du har råd med den stora risk som finns för att du kommer att förlora dina pengar.